Competition in the Classroom
In general, males thrive in a competitive
environment. They tend to be louder and more dominating in their speech in class
and will sometimes interrupt teachers or students to get their opinions heard. (Hadaway,
Online Reading,
Section 6.7). Girls are more comfortable in cooperative settings with less competition
(Vandrick, www.tokyoprogressive.org.uk/gale/articles/vandrick.html). I am assuming this draws from the nature of females to establish social connections
and relationships during the communication process and the tendency of females to be quieter and shyer than their male counterparts.
(Brown, 2002, pp259-260) Competition should not be eliminated from the curriculum, but perhaps limited in frequency within
a class with both males and females.
Outside Risk Factors Related to Gender and Achievement
Boys tend to be labeled as bigger
risk takers than women, but both sexes have outside factors that can influence their achievement. For example, males and females have the risk of dropping out of school.
Males have a higher drop out rate, but females are less likely to return to school.
Girls are sexually harassed more and have the possibility of pregnancy. A
larger percentage of females suffer from depression than males, and often times this depression goes unnoticed or untreated.
(Vandrick, www.tokyoprogressive.org.uk/gale/articles/vandrick.html) Many boys experience developmental delays and are disciplined at a higher rate
than their female classmates. More boys than girls are assigned to special
needs classes, and unfortunately, sometimes the recommendations are simply a “defect” with the teacher. (Hadaway,
Online Reading, Sections 6.6 & 6.7) All of these negative factors can sour motivational attitudes of students in language classes and effect
overall achievement. Awareness and knowing appropriate action for each situation
seem to be the only defenses against demotivation and subsequently transfer.
The Hidden Influence of Text
The AAUW has been closely monitoring
the progress of diversity with in educational texts, and more specifically gender. There
remains a large concern by the AAUW that women’s roles in textbooks are an additive approach rather than a transformation
or social action approach (B & K, pp 118-120). Interestingly, Vandrick states
that persons who are discriminated against because of gender are usually discriminated because of another intersecting diversity
factor such as race, ethnicity, or class as well. (Vandrick, www.tokyoprogressive.org.uk/gale/articles/vandrick.html)
Texts should include both genders
and all multicultural persons portrayed in non-traditional, non-stereotyped roles in a positive fashion to combat the socialized
roles.
|