Katherine Graff
DIVERSITY INCIDENT Session
2, Page 03, Activity 01
Course: EDUC 5329
Degree: M.Ed.T, Secondary, Foreign Languages
(Arabic)
Standards: ACTFL, NCPTS (
Content practice test NOT TAKEN
TExES content exam NOT TAKEN
PPR practice test NOT TAKEN
TExES PPR 8-12 NOT TAKEN
The
Professor That Taught What Was Not Intended BACKGROUND In
the fall of 1995, I began my freshman year as an undergraduate at the THE
STORY I
attended my first class and took my place at a small, cramped desk among 20
other freshmen piled into a small classroom at the end of a long, dark
hallway. We were greeted by a small
man adorned with an unsmiling, icy white face glaring at us behind a long,
thick black beard. As he introduced
himself as our professor, he displayed an air of arrogance and smugness that
made my insides cringe. He made it
very clear that he was a devout Jew, and that he planned to focus most of his
lessons on Judaism; we would touch lightly here and there on Roman
Catholicism and Orthodox Christianity.
His skeleton syllabus reflected his vocal intentions, and the tone was
set for the remainder of the class.
This professor was boring, monotonous and disregarded any opinions
submitted about the subject unless it was from Jewish students. His initial quizzes and tests (All on
paper-multiple choice or matching) were almost impossible to pass unless you
were a practicing Jew-I even attended temple with a Jewish friend for Rosh
Hashanah to gain knowledge that I could use on a quiz about Rosh Hashanah,
and I only achieved a “C”. After
about four weeks, I stopped attending class and focused on my other 12 hours
of academia. I was so angered by this
instructor’s policies, his personal conduct and classroom management skills
that I could not continue as a student in his classroom. I received an “F” because the drop window
had passed. I re-enrolled in the same
class in the Spring of my sophomore year (1997) and had a wonderful teacher. He took us all over the world exploring
the major religions in books and pulled out maps and texts for us to examine
during class. He drew comparisons between the religions, asked
critical thinking questions and answered any question posed with enthusiasm. I received a high “B” in this class and it
is one of the best classes I had as an undergraduate. ANALYZING
THE PROBLEM The
first professor made several mistakes in his curriculum and presentation. First, his end goals for his students did
not match the title of the course, “Religions of the World” or the course
description provided by the university.
Second, he did not take into account or care that he would have
students of other religions, in attendance in his classroom. Third, his coursework was too difficult for
the college’s diverse student population, so student-oriented success was not
a major factor in curriculum development.
Fourth, he maintained himself as the lone authority figure described
in our Classroom Management book on Page 16, disregarding students
thoughts and opinions on the class and materials. Fifth, he violated the law by imposing his
religious beliefs and practices upon his students and by oppressing the
religious beliefs and expressions of his students that were not of the Jewish
faith. Of course, as a 19-year-old
freshman, I was not aware of how bad this situation was, and unfortunately I
did not report him. I may have saved
myself an “F” and saved future students from my same situation. POTENTIAL
SOLUTIONS AND KNOWLEDGE GAINED Laws
concerning religion in public schools should be obeyed, especially if
religion is the subject taught. I am
subject to this since Islam is a major part of the Arabic Language. I know that there is “grey area” in some
cases, but great effort should be made to comply with regulations at all
times. Curriculum must be geared
toward the success of all students with realistic end goals that coincide
with the course description and student expectations. This concern can be equated with the
difficulties faced by the Sioux students in our Classroom Management book on
pages 8-10. The school’s unwillingness
to be student centered rather than behavior centered fostered an environment
under achievement and low student engagement.
Attention should be paid to potential diversity issues in subject
matter taught, information presentation, assessment, etc… Every effort should be made to create a
comfortable environment in which delicate issues such as religion can be
discussed without fear or reprimand. I
take a quick, voluntary assessment of students’ experiences and opinions about
religion and Islam in general so that I know what issues I can address in my
presentations. I allow my students to
have open discussion about religion in the classroom (controlled and
monitored by me to prevent harassment) and ask any question they can think
of. I encourage students to draw their
own comparisons between their individual religious practices and Islam or other religions practiced in Arabic speaking
countries. I also have a variety of
Cloze activities, matching games and assessments to accommodate learning
styles. CONCLUSION One
of the best lessons in life I have learned is that I can learn something from
anyone. I received an “F” in the first
religion class, but I also gained understanding of the potentially unknown effects
that a teacher who is not student-centered and has poor teaching skills can
have on students. This experience
motivates me to learn how I can improve myself as an educator and apply that
knowledge in my classroom every day. |
|